Connect with us

Technology

NFTs for supply chain management

The non-fungible token (NFT) market has surpassed 40 billion dollars in 2021, with nearly 41 billion dollars’ worth of cryptocurrency sent using smart contracts. This impressive market increase over the last year shows how interest is gathering around NFTs. With applications to various industries, from music to healthcare, it is time to assess how NFTs can benefit manufacturing too. Neil Bellinger, head of EMEA at automation parts supplier EU Automation, dives into the applications and benefits of NFTs for supply chain management. 

NFTs are non-replaceable units of data stored on a blockchain. These units are uniquely identifiable, and have been traditionally used as representations of digital assets such as videos, photos, music and digital art. However, their applications extend beyond the world of collectables.

For example, long, extensive and complex paper trails will soon be a thing of the past if companies are to implement NFTs to their supply chain. Instead of an endless paper trail of transactional ownerships and more, NFTs would create a digital footprint or a token ID that would follow that item throughout its lifespan. 

To be more specific, NFTs in the supply chain would work by creating a unique identification for each product. This ID would contain all the relevant information stored in the NTF’s metadata. Once this NFT is minted, product documentation is recorded using blockchain, which is updated in real-time. Due to the nature of blockchain, the records assigned to the NFT are unchangeable, reducing and potentially eliminating discrepancies in information between parties. 

NFTs’ transparency and immutability can ensure reliable and authentic supply chain data, making them the perfect management tool. 

Uses for NFTs in supply chain management

NFTs can be beneficial for supply chain purposes, as many companies are concerned with maintaining trustworthy digital data. NFTs ensure this data cannot be tampered with, making them perfect for supply chain management. NFTs also offer many other benefits, such as reliable traceability, product authentication and certification. 

Because NFTs can be assigned to physical, real-world objects, a supply chain manager can use them to track a variety of products and materials. To do this, the supply chain manager only needs to create a digital representation of the physical object on the blockchain to enable the transactions to be safely tracked and stored. 

The use of NFTs for traceability purposes allows for a range of useful tracking applications, such as tracking packages from warehouses, recording each new owner, and preventing package losses. NFTs can also be useful in tracking reusable packaging or expensive materials. This could help ensure consumers get the quality goods they ordered instead of cheaper alternatives, and helps prevent the loss of goods during delivery.

Other uses include product origin and authentication records. This allows third parties to easily confirm the product’s origin as well as its ownership history, just like a car logbook, except this record cannot be changed and is digital. The NFTs creator can even design it to send royalties back to the original creator every time the product is resold. The NFT can also be used to control and extend warranty and insurance information. This application is demonstrated by the luxury watch brand Breitling, which introduced NFT passports for their watches. 

NFTs can also be used to provide certifications for a product. Nowadays, consumers are becoming increasingly more selective about the products they buy, searching for trusted certifications such as fair trade. This concept can be applied to NFTs by having third-party certifiers for product standards or labour safety requirements that would mint the NFT with the appropriate certification. This would ensure the product is digitally labelled as certified, much like the physical free-range ones seen on eggs.

The challenges

There are legal aspects to consider with using NFTs and current law does little to protect them due to the infancy of the technology. Copyright protection currently exists separately to NFTs, meaning that NFT creators should be careful when it comes to marketing and advertising them. For example, an NFT could be created to represent a sculptor’s artwork and be sold as a creation of that sculptor even if the artist played no role in making the product or authorise the use of images.

Similar issues could occur when using NFTs in manufacturing. For example, an NFT could be created to represent a components design without the designer being aware or authorising the use of his designs. NFTs are known to have a common issue with plagiarism, fakes and spam, with more than 80 per cent of NFTs minted for free on OpenSea’s platform being reported for these issues.

However, there are ways to lessen counterfeit risks. Some platforms use manual verification to solve counterfeit issues, for example, OpenSea requires all people submitting NFTs for minting to provide information such as name, email, selection of works, social network presence, and more, in an effort to authenticate the person’s identity.

Although NFTs are a newer concept with kinks that still need working out, they show increasing potential across a variety of industries and are proving to be a more effective way of identifying and tracking items and information. With the growth of industry 4.0 and a push to make manufacturing more modern, NFTs are certainly a useful innovation to apply to a business. 

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

The need for speed: Why fintechs must supercharge background checks to stay competitive

Source: Finance Derivative

By Luke Shipley, Chief Executive Officer and co-founder at Zinc

In the fast-paced world of finance, and particularly where finance and technology intersect, hiring candidates with the right skills is crucial for staying ahead of the competition. For fintech firms, conducting fast yet thorough background checks is key to balancing regulatory compliance with the need for speed.

However, financial regulations in the UK demand rigorous oversight to safeguard consumer data, prevent fraud, and maintain financial stability. As part of these regulations, fintech companies must conduct thorough background checks to ensure new hires align with compliance standards, mitigating risks to both the company and its customers. These checks involve verifying critical information such as financial history, credit reports, criminal records and employment history, which are essential for determining the suitability of candidates handling sensitive financial data. These checks are both time-consuming and resource-intensive, slowing down the hiring process.

Fintech firms can sustain rapid growth and meet regulatory obligations without sacrificing operational efficiency by streamlining this crucial part of the hiring process with the right tools. This also enables HR teams to focus on creating a positive experience for new hires, rather than burdening them with additional administrative tasks. Implementing efficient systems that reduce these checks from weeks to days allows companies to swiftly onboard talent, maintain customer trust, and stay competitive.

Challenges of traditional background checks

Traditional background checks in the fintech industry are complex and time-consuming due to the stringent regulatory requirements that financial organisations must follow. Verifying candidates’ financial history, running credit reports, conducting Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS) checks, and confirming employment history for the past several years are all critical tasks. These checks are not only meticulous but also require coordination with external agencies, which often slows down the process.

Manual handling of these background checks can extend the hiring timeline by weeks or even months, creating operational inefficiencies for fintech companies that need to scale quickly in a competitive industry. Prolonged hiring cycles can also lead to delays in onboarding vital talent, putting added pressure on already stretched teams.

For HR departments, managing these extensive checks manually places a heavy administrative burden. The time spent gathering documentation, verifying information, and coordinating with third parties diverts HR professionals from focusing on more strategic initiatives, such as talent acquisition and improving the candidate experience. As a result, the manual process not only hinders recruitment efficiency but also affects the company’s ability to attract top talent in a timely manner.

Role of technology in streamlining background checks

Here, technology plays a crucial role as it revolutionises the background check process in fintech by reducing manual interventions and simplifying time-consuming tasks. Automated platform systems now handle complex steps like identity verification, credit checks, and employment history validations far more efficiently than traditional methods. These technologies not only speed up the process but also provide one centralised place for employee documentation and improve accuracy by reducing the risk of human error in verifying critical information.

Automation also allows fintech companies to complete thorough background checks in a fraction of the time, continuing to ensure global compliance without delaying the hiring process. HR teams are freed from the burden of manual data gathering by automating repetitive tasks and reminder emails so they can focus on higher-value activities, such as candidate engagement and talent strategy.

Moreover, integrating background check platforms with existing HR systems streamlines recruitment workflows. This integration ensures a seamless transfer of data, and provides real-time updates on the status of each candidate’s background check. The result is a faster, more efficient hiring process that allows fintech firms to onboard new employees quickly, creating a positive reflection of their brand at every stage of the onboarding process.

Improved candidate experience

Technology in recruitment not only benefits HR teams but also significantly enhances the candidate experience. Automated systems cut down lengthy waiting periods, helping candidates move through the hiring process more swiftly.

From digital applications to real-time status updates, candidates enjoy a seamless, transparent process, which minimises stress and uncertainty. This streamlined approach improves communication and ensures that candidates are informed at every stage of their check progress, fostering trust and keeping them engaged. Additionally, modern tools like AI-driven assessments or automated interview scheduling save time, allowing candidates to focus on showcasing their skills rather than dealing with logistical hassles. Fintech companies can improve their overall employer branding by providing a more efficient and organised hiring process, attracting top talent who appreciate a modern and tech-forward experience.

It is why speeding up background checks is crucial for fintech companies aiming to stay competitive. By leveraging modern technology, these companies can benefit from greater efficiency, regulatory adherence, and an enhanced candidate experience. Fintech firms should embrace tech-driven solutions to balance speed and regulatory requirements, ensuring a smooth, transparent, and efficient hiring process.

Continue Reading

Business

Three key questions on the road to AI adoption

By Gert-Jan Wijman, VP & GM EMEA, Celigo

In the world of IT, there is rarely a period when some technology trend isn’t promising to deliver greater efficiency, productivity, and competitive advantage.

Few trends, however, have ever been met with the level of attention, expectation, and investment that AI is currently receiving. Usually, we would expect to see diversity in how businesses react to new technologies as they learn and experiment, but in a recent survey of more than 1,200 global enterprise Operations and IT leaders, Celigo found that 97% of respondents already view AI as ‘critical to driving operational improvements in the coming year’. That’s amazing when you consider that less than 10 years ago, there weren’t machines considered reliable enough to provide language or image recognition at a human level.

Gert Jan Wijman

Of those 97%, the vast majority are already well into the swing of actively investing in AI: over three-quarters of businesses indicate that they have dedicated specific resources and budget to AI, while over four-fifths have a formal strategy or roadmap in place for AI implementation. However, usage does not automatically turn into benefits, and the sheer level of interest and effort in AI adoption only raises the stakes for businesses that need to show real ROI from their exploration of this new technology.

The data, and our experience based on working with IT customers, suggest that there are a few key questions which can point the way towards successful strategies that overcome roadblocks on the path to AI adoption.

Who leads the AI charge?

Whether the technology in question is a tailor-made solution or a plug-and-play tool,  the process is usually driven by IT teams. However, there are signs that for AI that isn’t the whole story. Just 26% of businesses, in fact, say that IT is at the forefront of their AI mandate, and over half allow users to implement AI solutions without formal IT oversight.

There are multiple reasons for this. For one, IT teams are often overburdened as it is, leaving them with little breathing room to take charge of something as all-encompassing as AI adoption. But at the same time, part of the promise of AI is the way that it can democratise access to technology, making complex processes more intuitive.

Indeed, 68% of businesses say they approve of a Citizen Developer mindset, in which knowledge workers are empowered to innovate processes in ways that were typically reserved for technology specialists. Such an approach has obvious benefits in terms of sharing the workload, and has the advantage that departments and teams are the experts in what capabilities would best augment their own workflows.

While there are clearly advantages to allowing citizen developers to play a role in implementing AI, it also exacerbates risks, particularly on grounds of security and data governance.To empower Citizen Developers safely, businesses first need a modern approach to integration.

Where does AI happen?

All AI applications start with good data. While any given department will have its key platforms for gathering and managing data – customer relationship management platforms, enterprise resource planning platforms, collaboration and productivity platforms, and so on – the best results will come when those data sources are brought together in a holistic way that can generate deeper insights.

The challenge of integration has been growing for a long time, as businesses lean on ever more cloud services to carry out day-to-day business. Having many specialised tools available can help teams to excel in their work, but it also makes connecting the business’s IT infrastructure together in a unified way exponentially more complex.

The arrival of AI is adding real urgency to this challenge: while employees may be able to find ways of navigating across many data sources, AI needs data to be available in a more frictionless way. Our survey found that businesses are expecting to exploit a huge diversity of data sources and types through their AI adoption, from cloud platforms and APIs to user interaction tracking and user feedback data.

In this context, investing solely in the end-goal of AI implementation risks either outcomes that underperform due to a lack of data or outcomes that create governance issues through inexpert data integrations. Attention should also be paid to technologies like Integration Platforms-as-a-Service (iPaaS), which can significantly simplify and normalise the underlying data integration challenge. Organisations should also place attention on the upskilling of staff through training so as to maximise the benefit of AI to the business.

How are AI benefits shared?

While security was the most common risk identified by respondents to our survey, 46% said that fears around jobs being replaced by AI are a concern in their organisations. As the Citizen Developer mindset suggests, however, AI is no different to any other technology in that it is ultimately by and for people.

Just as the adoption of specialised platforms by different teams can create data silos and integration challenges, permitting unchecked team-level innovation without IT oversight can ironically reinforce the very barriers that data integration aims to dismantle. This paradox highlights the delicate balance between fostering innovation and maintaining a cohesive, interconnected IT ecosystem. While team autonomy can drive rapid advancements and tailored solutions, it may inadvertently perpetuate isolation and fragmentation across the organisation’s data landscape. The challenge lies in cultivating an environment that encourages innovation while simultaneously ensuring new technologies and processes align with broader organisational goals for data accessibility and integration.

In order to maintain security while promoting the freedom to self-implement, it’s imperative that companies have a clear strategy on balancing the two. Establishing a clearly documented AI policy, for instance, can alleviate uncertainty over what is and isn’t allowed as people explore the technology. Creating an open culture of learning and experimentation can be helped with social feedback loops like lunch-and-learns, where non-technical employees share what has worked for them and IT leaders can offer their expert advice.

Over time, almost every business will experience AI as a critical driver of operational improvement. When so many businesses are investing so heavily, though, the real winners will be those who take the smartest path to the destination.

Continue Reading

Business

How can the financial sector ensure a safe future with software escrow?

Source: Finance Derivative

Director of Global Strategic Accounts at Escode, Andy Ramsbottom, highlights the importance of software escrow in a volatile financial climate and how venture capitalists and private equity firms can mitigate the risks of investment in tech.

Recent volatility across global markets has underscored the importance of being proactive in protecting capital, particularly when investing in the tech sector. For venture capitalists (VCs) and private equity firms (PEs), protecting investments whilst navigating a turbulent financial climate is paramount.

With the UK’s tech funding showing signs of recovery, now is the time for investors to take decisive steps to make sure their investments are sound. One of the most effective tools at their disposal is software escrow—a crucial mechanism that ensures the security and continuity of their investments.

Preparing for volatility

Financial shocks can happen unexpectedly. So, VCs and PEs must adopt strategies that protect their investments from unforeseen risks. Software escrow provides an invaluable safety net that allows investors to verify the assets they are investing in and ensure that their capital is being used wisely.

By leveraging escrow agreements, investors can mitigate risks associated with the software lifecycle. This includes ensuring that source code and intellectual property (IP) are securely held by an independent third party, ready to be released if certain conditions are met, such as a default by the software developer. This mechanism not only protects the investors’ capital but also gives them greater confidence in their investment’s long-term viability.

When does an investment need software escrow?

  1. Single lender agreements: In high-risk software investments, a single lender agreement is invaluable. It ensures that a developer’s IP is securely held and can be transferred to the lender in case of a default. This safeguard is particularly critical in scenarios where the success of the investment hinges on the continued operation and development of the software.
  2. Mergers and Acquisitions (M&A): During M&A transactions, software escrow offers a layer of security by ensuring that the acquired code and platforms have been independently verified. This process not only strengthens the credibility of the vendor but also reduces the risk for the acquiring entity. The escrow agreement also consolidates all necessary documentation, simplifying compliance with legal and regulatory requirements.
  3. In the due diligence process: During the investment process, an investor and their legal counsel can use Escrow as part of their due diligence. Escrow agreements can include regular verification testing, ensuring that the software being invested in remains functional and compliant with all regulations. For VCs and PEs, software escrow isn’t just about mitigating risks—it’s about ensuring the success and continuity of their investments. By putting these safeguards in place early, investors can protect their capital and ensure that their investments are resilient to any future disruptions.

A proactive approach to risk mitigation

A well-structured software escrow agreement can be the difference between a successful investment and a costly failure. By preparing for potential disruptions early on, investors can safeguard their interests and ensure the long-term success of their investments. Escrow agreements not only protect the current investment but also enhance the prospects of a smooth and profitable exit for investors.

With the assurance of a secure investment, VCs and PE firms can focus on planning their exit strategies. Escrow agreements provide an additional layer of security, making the business more attractive to potential buyers. When selling a software company, having an escrow agreement in place reassures acquirers that, in the event of significant disruptions, the source code and other critical assets will remain accessible. This reduces perceived risks, potentially expediting the sale process and leading to a higher valuation.

A software escrow agreement signals that the company is proactive in mitigating risks, showcasing robust governance and risk management practices. This is particularly appealing to buyers and investors who prioritise stability and continuity in their acquisitions.

Continue Reading

Copyright © 2021 Futures Parity.