Sustainability
Analysis: Company valuations and climate strategies are poles apart

Source: Reuters
LONDON, Nov 24 (Reuters) – Companies in the most polluting sectors that have invested in climate action often find themselves valued below peers that have been slower to do so, highlighting the difficulty of getting shareholders to back sustainability.
Investors have poured more than $30 trillion into environmental, social and corporate governance (ESG) strategies, data from the Global Sustainable Investment Alliance showed. read more
But the demand for sustainable investment has yet to remove the pressure to put profits first and pro-climate analysts are concerned the outcome of U.N. climate talks earlier this month did too little to help. read more
Analyses of companies globally by management consultancy Kearney in November seen exclusively by Reuters, as well as data by Credit Suisse Group AG published in April (CSGN.S), found that companies that lowered their emissions in sectors where doing so was expensive and government regulation was limited were valued less, on average, than more emitting peers.
Investors were only found to reward the most emitting companies, such as energy, mining and heavy industry, for taking action on climate change when the cost of doing so was relatively small and government support and regulations were relatively strong.
Investors want climate leadership, they want tangible transition plans, but at the same time they are only willing to reward companies that can do so without sacrificing returns,” Betty Jiang, Credit Suisse’s head of U.S. ESG research, said.
Given changing attitudes as climate change becomes more extreme, some see an opportunity to invest in companies cheaply before the market values their climate action more highly.
Others worry the risk of losing value is making corporate boards reluctant to act to avoid catastrophic climate change, especially after governments at the United Nations talks in Glasgow this month failed to send a strong message that global warming can be capped at 1.5 degrees Celsius (2.7 Fahrenheit).
“There is currently no clear line of sight between climate investing and its impacts. Green (investment) portfolios have not yet equated to a green planet,” said Anthony Cowell, head of asset management at KPMG Islands Group.
EUROPEAN INVESTORS VALUE SUSTAINABILITY MORE
Kearney calculated the valuation of 481 companies globally as a function of their cash flows.
It then assessed their climate action using the Transition Pathways Initiative benchmark (TPI), an investor initiative launched in 2017 to assess companies’ response to climate change.
Where TPI scores were not available, Kearney looked at a ratio of companies’ greenhouse gas emissions to their revenue to assign ESG leadership or laggard status.
Steel, chemicals, cement and power companies in Europe with top-rated carbon reduction plans have an average valuation premium of 62% to peers who are climate action laggards, the Kearney analysis found.
In the rest of the world, that premium is 25%, demonstrating that European investors value sustainability more than others globally.
Companies with higher climate scores in the aluminium, airlines, autos, diversified mining, infrastructure, maritime transport and oil and gas sectors show the opposite trend.
In Europe they trade at a 27% discount on average to environmental laggards, the analysis found. In the rest of the world, that discount is even wider – 41%.
Although many factors can skew a company’s valuation, Alexis Deladerriere, head of international developed markets equity at Goldman Sachs Group Inc (GS.N), said that in heavy-emitting sectors ESG scores were not reflected in a company’s valuation premium.
“There is basically no correlation – no valuation premium – for having a high ESG score in general or having a high ‘E’ score specifically,” Deladerriere said.
“If you are behaving badly, if you are polluting and you’re not doing anything about it, do you get penalised for doing that? Unfortunately, not really in the short term.”
ENERGY, MINING
The energy and mining sectors are dominated by risks that can impact valuation, but still the evidence is that the very sectors with leading roles in decarbonising are not being rewarded for moving away from fossil fuels.
BP Plc (BP.L), for example, is viewed as a climate leader with a top “4STAR” TPI level. Yet it has a lower valuation, as measured by its enterprise value to cash flow ratio, than many ESG laggards with lower TPI scores, such as U.S. peer Valero Energy Corp (VLO.N).
In the mining sector, Rio Tinto Plc is considered a climate leader, with a TPI score of 4, but its valuation premium is less than a third of that of Freeport-McMoRan, which is a climate-laggard by the TPI measure, Kearney’s data showed.
BP, Valero and Rio Tinto did not respond to requests for comment. A spokeswoman for Freeport-McMoRan said the company had made “significant progress” on climate in the last two years and is committed to “integrating our climate initiatives into our long-term business plans”.
As climate change becomes an even bigger focus for markets and regulators, some corporate directors say boards will start to take stronger action on climate change as more investors begin to give them credit for it.
“Every company wants to figure out how to do (sustainability) quickly and easily because it’s a shorter return on investment,” said Orlando Ashford, a director on the boards of companies including drug maker Perrigo and solar energy equipment manufacturer Array Technologies.
“If you fold it into the construct of how you are running your business it will take longer, but it’s not a fad,” Ashford said.
Reporting by Elizabeth Howcroft and Simon Jessop in London Additional reporting by Jessica DiNapoli in New York Editing by Greg Roumeliotis and Barbara Lewis
Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.
You may like
Business
Green Energy Legislation – How Your Business Can Keep Up

Britain’s commitment to its net zero targets has been called into jeopardy in recent weeks. Internal divisions within the Conservative party have seen Rishi Sunak look to weaken some of the nation’s commitments to reaching net zero emissions.
However, evidence shows that customers remain more environmentally conscious than ever. A Deloitte survey found that 35% of UK adults were more likely to trust a business with a transparent, accountable and socially and environmentally responsible supply chain.
So, what can your business do to maintain or grow its sustainability credentials whilst staying in line with green and traditional legislation?
Why operating sustainably is more important than ever
In spite of the Conservative party’s stance on the nation’s net zero targets, strong green credentials remain crucial for businesses to appeal to an increasingly eco-conscious public. 29% of UK adults are likely to prioritise a business with a strong public perception, record and reputation around climate change and sustainability over a business without.
It’s not just B2C businesses that have grounds to be concerned. UK companies operating internationally should also be watching the situation closely. The new proposal threatens to undermine UK investment from abroad and weaken our international standing with clients and business partners alike, leaving business leaders furious and investors ‘spooked’.
The EU’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism came into play in October 2023, creating a further divergence between the UK and Europe’s green legislation. EU companies are now responsible for compiling reports on the carbon emissions attached to certain goods, such as steel, aluminium and fertilisers.
So, though the British government may be content with relaxing our net zero commitments, UK businesses operating in Europe cannot be. The onus has been placed upon UK businesses to increase their sustainability credentials or risk being left behind.
Interrogate your operating practices
Companies looking to operate more sustainably are often faced with the initial challenge of identifying exactly where and how the company can become greener. Modern software solutions, however, are making this simpler.
Products such as Microsoft’s Sustainability Manager have given businesses the tools to interrogate their own working practices, acting as a hub for data intelligence from across the organisation. Allowing business owners to precisely calculate the sources of their emissions, this tool enables organisations to record, report and actively reduce their environmental impact.
This level of visibility is a huge benefit to businesses operating in a range of different countries. Even before the Prime Minister’s latest comments, concerns persisted about the UK’s failure to align its sustainability rules with the EU and US.
With the implementation of the EU green tax, international alignment of your business’s green policies is more important than ever. Sustainability Manager allows total visibility over emissions in an international supply chain, allowing your company to strengthen its foothold in the green economy.
Maximise your impact with collaboration – safely
This month, the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) released new guidance to help businesses better understand how they can collaborate to meet sustainability goals without falling foul of competition law. The Green Agreements Guidance explains how competition law applies to sustainability agreements between firms operating at the same level of the supply chain.
Such examples might include farmers aiming to improve or protect biodiversity by reducing usage of pesticides, or fashion companies agreeing to stop using certain fabrics that contribute to microplastic pollution.
The impact that multiple businesses can have on the environment outranks that of a single business in isolation, so collaboration can be a strong route to improve sustainability practices – but it’s important to do so legally. The CMA has adopted an ‘open-door policy’ regarding business collaboration in the name of sustainability, so be sure to consult them before carrying out a project like this.’
Avoid greenwashing – or pay the price
There’s no substitute for real, meaningful change. Given the importance of sustainability to the consumer, some less scrupulous businesses have been caught out by greenwashing – using unproven environmental assertions to sell products or enhance their public perception.
Earlier in 2023, the CMA were given new powers to impose direct civil penalties on companies who have been making misleading environmental claims. Your business could face fines of up to 10% of global turnover for breaches of consumer law in this manner – so any claims related to your business’s sustainability credentials must be thoroughly investigated before going public.
Support the sustainability push with external funding
In many cases, making your business more sustainable is an endeavour which requires significant operational change – and implementing such change can be a costly investment. Businesses should not be afraid of utilising external facilities like green loans or bonds to realise these changes.
Green loans and bonds are subject to an international standard known as the Green Loan Principles, which ensure the transparency of your borrowing and the environmental impact of your changes. This can protect your business against accusations of greenwashing and keep you focused on the task at hand.
Global green finance increased tenfold between 2012 and 2022, indicating just how many businesses are utilising external funding to become more sustainable. Don’t be afraid to explore your options – improving your sustainability credentials could be more achievable than expected.
Charlotte Enright, Head of Renewables at Anglo Scottish, commented: “In light of these changes to the UK’s renewable commitments, it can be difficult for UK businesses to keep informed on their responsibilities. That’s why it’s more important than ever for these companies to be proactive and drive change from within.”
Business
Leading the charge for sustainability; How fintech are key players in creating a cleaner, greener future

Sourced: Finance Derivative
By Jeremy Baber, CEO of Lanistar
The climate crisis has officially reached “a code red for humanity.” This is according to the latest Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report, which delivered a “final warning” earlier this year. The urgency for investments and capital to be placed in sustainable hands for meaningful action has therefore only increased. To safeguard a transition towards greener practice and avert the environmental crisis as much as possible before it becomes too late, intelligent allocation of economy is imperative. The finance sector remains the principal driver for any such decisions, and so ultimately crafting a lower-carbon and more sustainable world is primarily in their hands.
Historically, the sector has always led the way for incorporating more sustainable practices, particularly when it comes to investing in energy-efficient and work-efficient technologies that we will continue using for years to come. The rise of fintech’s, alongside investments in the use of artificial intelligence (AI), the internet of things (IoT), machine learning (ML) and even the proliferation of blockchain are all ways in which finance have been ahead of the mainstream in adopting newer, cleaner technology.
Now, with environmental consciousness at an all-time high, both from a governmental and consumer standpoint, the responsibility is upon fintech’s to mediate this transition to greater sustainability. The time for sustainable net zero or even net negative global CO2 emissions is now to ensure a sustainable future before it is too late.
A cleaner consumer conscious through cleaner practices
Recent research from the open banking platform Tink has revealed that 40% of customers wish to track this impact through services provided by their bank. Consumers want a clear conscious when it comes to their personal impact, and therefore to hold their retail businesses of choice accountable, especially when many will stake green claims for consumer trust but not actually follow through.
Fintech’s can hold feet to the fire in this regard, and act in the best interests of their own consumers as an intermediary for directing businesses to change. Currently, there is a significant gap in the market for innovative tracking solutions, with Tink’s research suggesting a significant number of customers would switch purely for access to tools to track carbon footprint. Whilst 30% of surveyed banks have expressed interest in offering these tools, currently these institutions have zero plans to actually do so. It is easy to make green claims to gain customer support, but fintech’s pushing for responsibility for the sake of their customers helps motivate action.
Gen Z and millennials have been proven to be more environmentally conscious generations than ever before when it comes to their spending habits, in particular with their demands for greater transparency when it comes to tracking and reducing their overall impact on the environment. Retail Week reported over half of UK consumers are more likely to buy from a retailer or brand with a strong ethical and sustainable ethos, with Millennials more likely to be eco-conscious and by contrast the Boomer generation less so than other generations. The future market is a sustainable one, and fintech’s should be looking to capitalise upon it.
A new era for investing in sustainability
The rise of financial technology over the past decade has created a new era of potential for sustainable investing, particularly in the fields of ESG investing, green financing and carbon neutrality. Fintech’s have always enabled innovation and contributed positively towards sustainability for a lower-carbon world, particularly as they aim to disrupt traditional finance operations in a customer-focused way.
Digital payment solutions can lead the charge towards sustainability and a low-carbon economy. The carbon footprint brought by physical currency – i.e., its creation, transportation, disposal, etc. – is minimised or else eclipsed by using digital cash transactions. Utilising digital removes the need for both plastic cards and paper transactions, streamlining transaction processes in an environmentally conscious way through reducing company waste.
Change still requires a business incentive
Changes in operations absolutely require a business incentive for CEOs to choose to adopt.
In highlighting a consumer demand, businesses can feel more secure in continuing to fight for innovations in technology and lower-carbon alternatives, as both enable them to have an edge from a consumer standpoint. Nevertheless, customers are smarter and more discerning than ever when choosing financial services and are more likely to scrutinise green credentials before committing to a provider.
It is no longer as simple as just claiming to support green initiatives; real meaningful action is needed at every step and with every initiative to attract and secure interest from target consumers, lest they leave to seek a stronger alternative elsewhere. The truth is that, whilst many bigger fintech’s have greater resources to allocate to sustainable initiatives, few are actually choosing to do so.
Smaller fintech’s lead; bigger giants to follow
Financial organisations with bigger pockets have the power to push for greener tech across the board, yet the agility of smaller fintech’s to deploy sustainable initiatives has meant that they are often leading the charge for greener decisions across operations. As the fintech sector continues to mature, business initiatives can continue to refocus the ecosystem away from short-term successes and instead towards long-term green practices. Yet, if traditional companies are unable to change, they have the potential to be outmanoeuvred by their smaller underdog competitors.
Similarly, it is time for the UK government to step up their responsibility to support and protect greener technologies. The finance sector has the power and potential to put pressure for change in this regard, but policy is indeed needed without the promise of profit to secure a better future.
Business
Consolidating ESG Considerations in Private Equity

Source: Finance Derivative
Spokesperson: Isabella Calderon Hoyos, Partner, OMMAX
ESG is a familiar term in investors’ vocabulary that has evolved in recent years. It has progressed beyond a point of compliance into a strategic imperative for value creation. To meet the demands of regulators, as well as expectations of investors, customers and employees, private equity firms must transparently demonstrate their commitment to responsible and sustainable investment practices across their portfolio.
Additionally, we are seeing increasing examples of ESG benefits in the form of financial advantages. Organisations that authentically integrate ESG best-practices, significantly outperform their peers when it comes to revenue, CAPEX and cost of capital.
Assessing & Managing Potential Risk
Environmental, social and governance issues present significant risks to investments and their growth potential, whether it might be regulatory non-compliance, operational and supply chain disruptions, legal liabilities, or reputational damage. However, it is crucial for firms to ensure their ESG claims are authentic rather than leaving themselves exposed to, or inadvertently engaging in, greenwashing.

To this end, ESG efforts should be incorporated during the entire deal lifecycle, starting with the due diligence stage, to effectively identify, assess and mitigate any ESG risks early on to avoid later damages. Such thorough due diligence practices also ensure adaptability of the portfolio company to changing regulatory landscapes and evolving stakeholder expectations, enhancing resilience to ESG-related risks and uncertainties. For example, a manufacturing company may prioritise energy efficiency (environmental), labour practices (social), and board diversity (governance) in its decision-making process.
PE firms are also facing increasing ESG pressure from stakeholders. Stakeholders, including investors, customers, employees, and the public, expect to see transparent ESG strategies and how these factors are integrated into decision-making processes. As these expectations become standard for stakeholders and regulatory bodies alike, any decision to neglect ESG considerations becomes a bigger risk as time goes on.
Regulation Across a Portfolio
Regarding ESG reporting and disclosure, private equity firms must stay informed about the evolving regulatory landscape. For example, the EU Sustainable Finance Framework introduces new regulations for integrating ESG considerations into financial sector investment decisions and compliance is essential for private equity firms, necessitating processes for accessing and managing ESG data and integrating scoring into portfolios.
Private equity firms can also bolster reporting consistency by adopting voluntary standards like the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) and introducing the ESG Sustainability Risk Score (ESRS) which considers both the financial impact of sustainability on businesses and businesses on sustainability. By identifying material issues, private equity firms can allocate their resources to areas with the highest potential for impact.
Using Technology
Technology plays a crucial role in facilitating ESG integration into the deal lifecycle. By integrating technology into a firm’s target operating model, efficiency and effectiveness can be achieved. For instance, technology enables the collection, aggregation, and analysis of vast amounts of ESG data through AI and ML which, in turn, can be leveraged for transparent reporting and informing improvement strategies.
Taking the example of carbon reporting, integrating one of the many carbon management solutions available enables companies to automate and standardise the ESG reporting process. This not only improves the quality of ESG disclosures but also enhances efficiency and cost savings.
Driving Value Throughout
By actively engaging with portfolio companies, setting targets, tracking progress, and measuring the impact of ESG efforts, firms encourage conscious and competitive inclusion of ESG principles. This not only helps firms work toward their own ESG goals and branding efforts but also enhances the long-term sustainability of portfolios.
To drive value creation, private equity firms can incorporate ESG considerations from due diligence onwards and work closely with portfolio companies to improve their ESG performance. This collaboration means implementing ESG initiatives, setting measurable targets, and monitoring progress.
By actively addressing ESG factors and through enforcing consistent reporting from portfolio companies, private equity firms can enhance long-term returns, build trust with investors, stakeholders and customers, and contribute to a more sustainable future.

The state of Artificial Intelligence in 2024

‘Tis the Season to be Wary: How to Protect Your Business from Holiday Season Hacking

Transforming unified comms to future-proof your business

The Sustainability Carrot Could be More Powerful Than the Stick!

Hybrid cloud adoption: why vendors are making the switch in 2022 and why you should too
