Connect with us

Business

Which Cloud architecture model is best for Insurtech?

Adam Gaca, Head of Managed Services & CloudOps at Future Processing

It’s no surprise that insurers are quickly adopting Cloud solutions as part of their core technology platforms, modifying legacy systems to make way for digitally advanced software. Global cloud infrastructure service spending increased to $57 billion in Q3 of 2022, bringing the industry total for the previous twelve months to $217 billion. There are numerous ways for insurers to use the Cloud to improve their business operations, particularly when it comes to deploying new applications or services, reducing time to market, and improving data storage and backup resilience.

The insurance industry was one of the first to embrace Cloud computing, with nearly 60% of companies utilising the technology in some capacity. There are several reasons for this, the most important of which is that it allows for greater agility and can handle large amounts of traffic, making it the ideal platform for insurers to scale their offerings during periods of high activity. The insurance industry is highly competitive and regulated, and companies must be able to respond quickly to changes in the market, making the Cloud the perfect solution. It can, furthermore, be used to connect Insurtech systems to third-party providers via APIs, giving them access to better functionalities and improving customer service with real-time responses.

Different Archetypes for Different Requirements

There is no doubt that Cloud computing has transformed the insurance industry, but the most important question for IT leaders in this space is: what Cloud architecture model is best for their business? They have three options for Cloud architecture: public, private, and hybrid, each with its own set of challenges and benefits. The best cloud architecture for a company is determined by several factors, including the type of data they are working with, their budget, and the level of control they require over the infrastructure. Companies must consider the advantages and disadvantages of each type of Cloud architecture to determine which best meets their business requirements.

Public Cloud Architecture

The public Cloud has democratised technology, allowing businesses of all sizes to access the same level of innovation and scale as the largest corporations. A third-party service provider owns and manages this cloud infrastructure, and the resources are made available to the general public via the Internet. It provides lower upfront costs because resources are paid based on usage, elasticity, and scalability, allowing insurers to adjust resource usage as needed. Finally, it lowers IT costs as the service provider handles most of the infrastructure maintenance.

However, the public Cloud is not without its drawbacks. Limited upfront costs also mean limited control over the infrastructure and security. And with that comes the potential for privacy concerns, as data is stored in a third-party data centre. Public Cloud providers implement a variety of security measures to protect their customers’ data, but there is always a risk of data breaches, data loss, or unauthorised access. Ultimately, the greatest challenge comes with the possibility of service outages or disruptions due to shared infrastructure and dependence on internet connectivity.

Private Cloud Architecture

This is a Cloud infrastructure owned and managed by a single insurer, and the resources are only used by that organisation. Private Clouds enable faster and more flexible deployment of new applications, resources, and services than traditional IT infrastructure, while also providing greater control and security for sensitive data and applications. This means it’s an excellent Insurtech solution, as the industry has its own set of regulatory compliance. Furthermore, as long as it is well designed and maintained, it provides greater reliability than public networks.

Nevertheless, the advantages of a private solution entail much higher upfront costs as well as ongoing costs for infrastructure maintenance. Furthermore, the complexities of implementing this type of solution result in companies having limited scalability compared to a public Cloud. Finally, a private Cloud requires a team to manage, maintain, and adjust it as needed, which means insurers will need an in-house IT team with infrastructure expertise.

Hybrid Cloud Architecture

This Cloud infrastructure combines both public and private Cloud architectures, allowing insurers the flexibility to utilise both benefits. Beyond the obvious advantages of elasticity in a hybrid architecture, it also proved unprecedented scalability, depending on usage and workload requirements. What’s more, the hybrid Cloud delivers all the security and compliance needed to manage sensitive data in the insurance industry, while still providing flexibility.

However, with the integration of different solutions comes complexities. Integrating data between public and private Clouds can be challenging, as data may need to be migrated between different systems and formats, and data consistency and synchronisation must be ensured. Moreover, ensuring connectivity between public and private Clouds can be challenging, as different network architectures and protocols may be involved, and security and performance requirements must be addressed, especially in the insurance industry where most data is highly sensitive. Furthermore, as with any IT solution, there is a potential for security and data privacy issues if not properly managed.

Choosing The Right Tech

Cloud computing can provide greater agility and scalability while also handling high volumes of traffic, making it an ideal platform for insurers. But choosing a solution necessitates a thorough understanding of an organisation’s goals, processes, and challenges and an in-depth understanding of the capabilities and limitations of available technologies. The key to selecting the right Cloud type for insurers is to concentrate on solving specific business problems and identifying the technology that best addresses those problems.

Each of the three Cloud architectures has its own set of challenges and benefits, and insurers must weigh the pros and cons of each to determine which one best meets their needs. Choosing the right Cloud architecture model is critical to success in the insurance industry, whether a company is looking for lower upfront costs, greater control over infrastructure and security, or the flexibility to leverage the benefits of both public and private Clouds.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

Overcoming intricacies of premium processing in the insurance industry

Source: Finance Derivative

By Piers Williams, Global Insurance Manager at AutoRek

Complexity is an unavoidable reality for the intricate world of insurance. For program administrators, including brokers, managing general agents (MGAs) and managing general underwriters (MGUs), accurate management of insurance premium payments and complex workflows like bulk payments and diverse data sources is essential – there cannot be room for error. Unfortunately, poorly executed and complex processes can lead to costly mistakes. This is especially true for essential financial control processes that directly impact the performance of insurance businesses such as premium payment processes – also commonly known in corporate industries as account receivable and payable processes.

In particular, the traditional, manual management of insurance premium payments is what can often lead to unresolved outstanding debt and large balances of unallocated cash. When you combine this with the 30% growth in delegated/program businesses (over 30%+ in the last 3 years), using Excel sheets and the ever-increasing policy volumes, the approach becomes unsustainable and inefficient.

This article will outline the transformative benefits automation offers and the key actionable strategies that will enable program administrators to optimise the management of insurance premium payments for greater efficiency and effectiveness in their financial operations.

Embracing automation: the future of insurance

The future of insurance lies in automation – this is where premium payment processing comes in. Automation enables businesses not to erode margins through write-offs but accelerate cash flow and protect revenue. The primary goal is to accelerate premium reconciliation and allocation by implementing an automated straight-through process, minimising the need for human intervention to ensure that minutes – not hours – are spent on the reconciliation process.

By leveraging automated systems and advanced data integration, premium payment processing has the potential to offer a more streamlined, accurate and effective insurance ecosystem. Automation minimises the likelihood of human error and delays in transaction times; ensuring that precision is at the forefront of the financial processes. This shift towards automation addresses one of the key challenges faced by the insurance industry – eliminating inefficiencies which can lead to costly mistakes and unnecessary delays.

Producing scalability in a competitive market

Program administrators are confronted with a multitude of pain points in their day-to-day operations. Given that program administrators handle a significant amount of insurance policies across multiple binders/programs in the market, considerable admin effort is required to process a vast number of internal and external data sources as well as payments and policy data. As a result, program administrators risk losing valuable time and resources – giving them less time for value-added tasks, like resolving breaks, addressing downstream issues, and creating better partnerships with insurance partners.  

The impact of such operational inefficiencies can impact not only accounts receivable, collections and credit control processes but also business profitability, binder/program performance, competitiveness and reputation to name a few. Without the adoption of more advanced technologies like automation, program administrators are increasingly at threat of not being able to produce scalability in a competitive market.

Whilst automation offers huge efficiency upside for businesses there are also many benefits delivered by simply having a single premium data control platform. One of the most notable challenges with premium payment operations is the often-large numbers of internal and external data sources that must be managed and processed. This data needs to be continuously processed to ensure reporting is up to date and management has a comprehensive view of outstanding premiums, allocated premium and cash positions at any point in time. The management of this data, if not performed within a platform, presents a huge risk from a control perspective, as often premium payments will not be allocated for 30, 60 or 90 days, therefore needing a solution to keep track of all data automatically to ensure efficiency and control to ensure.

The opportunities premium payment platforms unlock not only when reconciling and allocation premium but also from a financial data control, consolidation and audit perspective, can be transformative. When this is further combined with the new reporting that is unlocked and streamlined operations using features like workflows leads to a drastically enhanced and often very different operating model. This model, however, enables businesses to work in near real-time, enhance relationships and most importantly remain competitive.

Identifying and addressing inefficient processes

Investing in modern technology like automation is often the first step in streamlining operations and eliminating inefficient processes. The goal is to encourage program administrators to focus less on manual administrative tasks that are time-consuming and instead, focus on key business decision making to improve financial gain – automating manual processes does exactly that.

Likewise, the insurance industry is constantly evolving so the adoption of premium payment processing will be crucial in remaining competitive in a shifting market dynamic. With this in mind, legacy systems, once the backbone of insurance operations, must go. These systems are outdated and unable to meet the demands of a data-driven, regulated market, leading businesses to embrace digital transformation and no longer depend on inefficient processes.

Continue Reading

Business

Who’s Scared of Embedded Payments?

Source: Finance Derivative

Johannes Kolbeinsson, CEO at PAYSTRAX

Embedded payments have been swiftly integrated into the e-commerce ecosystem, showcasing their transformative potential in reshaping how we make transactions. There is a bright future for embedded payments, but we must emphasise the significant untapped potential within the space as it currently stands, as the user experience still isn’t quite seamless, and third-party payment processors still present a fraud risk to companies. 

A Rapidly Expanding Market

The growth of embedded payments is undeniable. Driven by the rise of digital wallets and one-click checkout systems, the global market for embedded finance as a whole is projected to grow from $92 billion to $228 billion between 2024 and 2028. Recent shifts in consumer behaviour, especially toward frictionless digital experiences, have been accelerating the adoption of these solutions across sectors. Embedded payments offer that seamless one system approach, not only quickly processing payments on app, but building a one app relationship with consumers that develops brand loyalty.

This trend directly mirrors the business strategies of the major players in the tech world. Companies such as Apple, with its mobile wallet and credit card ventures, and Shopify, combining e-commerce with embedded payments, have demonstrated that blending payments directly into platforms can drive user engagement and boost conversions. The logic is plain and simple: by keeping consumers within the app, businesses streamline the purchasing process, increasing the likelihood of finalising transactions, and building brand and customer loyalty.

The Embedded Payments Boom

Embedded payments have become the latest hot topic in fintech. In fact, just a few years ago, in 2020, embedded finance payments were generating around $16 billion in revenue. Looking ahead to next year, forecasts suggest that number will skyrocket to over $140 billion. The success of platforms like Uber with one-click payments and the buy-now-pay-later (BNPL) models from companies like Klarna are clear indicators of this shift. Consumers increasingly seek ease and convenience, and embedded payments are meeting those demands head-on.

However, for all the excitement, embedded payments still face challenges in adoption. Fraud prevention, authentication, and user experience remain key barriers that need to be addressed on an industry wide level to truly deliver the seamless, instant payments these systems promise consumers.

Addressing the Friction

While the promise of embedded payments is enticing, friction remains. One of the most critical challenges for businesses adopting embedded payments is ensuring robust risk management. Creating an online experience that feels as secure as an in-store transaction should be a top priority, especially as financial fraud becomes more prevalent.

Currently, many companies are jumping into embedded payments without fully understanding the complexities involved. The lack of in-house expertise in building the necessary infrastructure across digital services, transaction processing, and enablement layers can lead to implementation issues and security vulnerabilities. Businesses need to conduct proper due diligence to avoid potential pitfalls, as hasty implementations can compromise both functionality and security.

User experience is another key factor in determining the success of embedded payments. Historically, we’ve seen how PayPal revolutionised online payments with its email-and-password system, setting a new standard. Embedded payments, while advanced, are still evolving to achieve a truly frictionless experience. Authentication processes frequently occur outside of the platform or app, and the range of payment options can be limited. To fully realise the potential of embedded payments, businesses must balance security, usability, and convenience.

Trust and Security Concerns

Security and trust are paramount when it comes to anything finance related, and these are areas where embedded payments must improve to gain widespread consumer adoption. With growing concerns about data privacy and the rise in online fraud (40% of all reported crime in the UK last year were fraud), it’s clear that consumers need reassurance before embracing embedded payments.

While embedded payment systems offer unparalleled convenience, their inherent vulnerabilities could make them a prime target for cybercriminals. The lack of standardisation and regulation in the sector, coupled with a general shortage of expertise that comes with a new industry, poses significant risks for users. Nevertheless, history suggests that consumers are willing to trust new technologies over time. Just a decade ago, saving card details online was met with hesitation; today, it’s commonplace. Similarly, as security concerns are addressed, embedded payments will likely gain traction as consumer trust grows.

The Path Ahead for Embedded Payments

Despite the array of payment methods available today, the potential for embedded payments to dominate the future of finance is undeniable. Their speed, ease, and ability to facilitate in-app purchases with a simple click make them an attractive option for both consumers and businesses.

Yet, for embedded payments to live up to their promise, key challenges remain. User experience and authentication are the primary obstacles. Truly embedded payments should enable users to complete transactions within the app, without being redirected elsewhere for authentication. As instant payments become the norm, any requirement to leave an app to verify a purchase could deter adoption. Addressing these issues will be critical to the future success of embedded payments as they continue to evolve and reshape the digital landscape.

In the coming years, as innovations like AI-driven fraud detection and biometric authentication become more integrated, the potential for embedded payments to achieve a truly seamless experience will grow. This could be the defining shift that cements embedded payments as the default mode of financial transactions in our increasingly digital world.

Continue Reading

Business

The need for speed: Why fintechs must supercharge background checks to stay competitive

Source: Finance Derivative

By Luke Shipley, Chief Executive Officer and co-founder at Zinc

In the fast-paced world of finance, and particularly where finance and technology intersect, hiring candidates with the right skills is crucial for staying ahead of the competition. For fintech firms, conducting fast yet thorough background checks is key to balancing regulatory compliance with the need for speed.

However, financial regulations in the UK demand rigorous oversight to safeguard consumer data, prevent fraud, and maintain financial stability. As part of these regulations, fintech companies must conduct thorough background checks to ensure new hires align with compliance standards, mitigating risks to both the company and its customers. These checks involve verifying critical information such as financial history, credit reports, criminal records and employment history, which are essential for determining the suitability of candidates handling sensitive financial data. These checks are both time-consuming and resource-intensive, slowing down the hiring process.

Fintech firms can sustain rapid growth and meet regulatory obligations without sacrificing operational efficiency by streamlining this crucial part of the hiring process with the right tools. This also enables HR teams to focus on creating a positive experience for new hires, rather than burdening them with additional administrative tasks. Implementing efficient systems that reduce these checks from weeks to days allows companies to swiftly onboard talent, maintain customer trust, and stay competitive.

Challenges of traditional background checks

Traditional background checks in the fintech industry are complex and time-consuming due to the stringent regulatory requirements that financial organisations must follow. Verifying candidates’ financial history, running credit reports, conducting Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS) checks, and confirming employment history for the past several years are all critical tasks. These checks are not only meticulous but also require coordination with external agencies, which often slows down the process.

Manual handling of these background checks can extend the hiring timeline by weeks or even months, creating operational inefficiencies for fintech companies that need to scale quickly in a competitive industry. Prolonged hiring cycles can also lead to delays in onboarding vital talent, putting added pressure on already stretched teams.

For HR departments, managing these extensive checks manually places a heavy administrative burden. The time spent gathering documentation, verifying information, and coordinating with third parties diverts HR professionals from focusing on more strategic initiatives, such as talent acquisition and improving the candidate experience. As a result, the manual process not only hinders recruitment efficiency but also affects the company’s ability to attract top talent in a timely manner.

Role of technology in streamlining background checks

Here, technology plays a crucial role as it revolutionises the background check process in fintech by reducing manual interventions and simplifying time-consuming tasks. Automated platform systems now handle complex steps like identity verification, credit checks, and employment history validations far more efficiently than traditional methods. These technologies not only speed up the process but also provide one centralised place for employee documentation and improve accuracy by reducing the risk of human error in verifying critical information.

Automation also allows fintech companies to complete thorough background checks in a fraction of the time, continuing to ensure global compliance without delaying the hiring process. HR teams are freed from the burden of manual data gathering by automating repetitive tasks and reminder emails so they can focus on higher-value activities, such as candidate engagement and talent strategy.

Moreover, integrating background check platforms with existing HR systems streamlines recruitment workflows. This integration ensures a seamless transfer of data, and provides real-time updates on the status of each candidate’s background check. The result is a faster, more efficient hiring process that allows fintech firms to onboard new employees quickly, creating a positive reflection of their brand at every stage of the onboarding process.

Improved candidate experience

Technology in recruitment not only benefits HR teams but also significantly enhances the candidate experience. Automated systems cut down lengthy waiting periods, helping candidates move through the hiring process more swiftly.

From digital applications to real-time status updates, candidates enjoy a seamless, transparent process, which minimises stress and uncertainty. This streamlined approach improves communication and ensures that candidates are informed at every stage of their check progress, fostering trust and keeping them engaged. Additionally, modern tools like AI-driven assessments or automated interview scheduling save time, allowing candidates to focus on showcasing their skills rather than dealing with logistical hassles. Fintech companies can improve their overall employer branding by providing a more efficient and organised hiring process, attracting top talent who appreciate a modern and tech-forward experience.

It is why speeding up background checks is crucial for fintech companies aiming to stay competitive. By leveraging modern technology, these companies can benefit from greater efficiency, regulatory adherence, and an enhanced candidate experience. Fintech firms should embrace tech-driven solutions to balance speed and regulatory requirements, ensuring a smooth, transparent, and efficient hiring process.

Continue Reading

Copyright © 2021 Futures Parity.