Business
Conflicting with compliance: How the finance sector is struggling to implement GenAI
By James Sherlow, Systems Engineering Director, EMEA, for Cequence Security
GenerativeAI has multiple applications in the finance sector from product development to customer relations to marketing and sales. In fact, McKinsey estimates that GenAI has the potential to improve operating profits in the finance sector by between 9-15% and in the banking sector, productivity gains could be between 3-5% of annual revenues. It suggests AI tools could be used to boost customer liaison with AI integrated through APIs to give real-time recommendations either autonomously or via CSRs, to inform decision making and expedite day-to-day tasks for employees, and to decrease risk by monitoring for fraud or elevated instances of risk.
However, McKinsey also warns of inhibitors to adoption in the sector. These include the level of regulation applicable to different processes, which is fairly low with respect to customer relations but high for credit risk scoring, for example, and the data used, some of is in the public domain but some of which comprises personally identifiable information (PII) which is highly sensitive. If these issues can be overcome, the analyst estimates GenAI could more than double the application of expertise to decision making, planning and creative tasks from 25% without to 56%.
Hamstrung by regulations
Clearly the business use cases are there but unlike other sectors, finance is currently being hamstrung by regulations that have yet to catch up with the AI revolution. Unlike in the EU which approved the AI Act in March, the UK has no plans to regulate the technology. Instead, it intends to promote guidelines. The UK Financial Authorities comprising the Bank of England, PRA, and FCA have been canvassing the market on what these should look like since October 2022, publishing the results (FS2/23 – AI and Machine Learning) a year later which showed a strong demand for harmonisation with the likes of the AI Act as well as NIST’s AI Risk Management Framework.
Right now, this means financial providers find themselves in regulatory limbo. If we look at cyber security, for instance, firms are being presented with GenAI-enabled solutions that can assist them with incident detection and response but they’re not able to utilise that functionality because it contravenes compliance requirements. Decision-making processes are a key example as these must be made by a human, tracked and audited and, while the decision-making capabilities of GenAI may be on a par, accountability in remains a grey area. Consequently, many firms are erring on the side of caution and are choosing to deactivate AI functionality within their security solutions.
In fact, a recent EY report found one in five financial services leaders did not think their organisation was well-positioned to take advantage of the potential benefits. Much will depend on how easily the technology can be integrated into existing frameworks, although the GenAI and the Banking on AI: Financial Services Harnesses Generative AI for Security and Service report cautions this may take three to five years. That’s a long time in the world of GenAI, which has already come a long way since it burst on to the market 18 months ago.
Malicious AI
The danger is that while the sector drags its heels, threat actors will show no such qualms and will be quick to capitalise on the technology to launch attacks. FS2/23 makes the point that GenAI could see an increase in money laundering and fraud through the use of deep fakes, for instance, and sophisticated phishing campaigns. We’re still in the learning phase but as the months tick by the expectation is that we can expect to see high-volume self-learning attacks by the end of the year. These will be on an unprecedented scale because GenAI will lower the technological barrier to entry, enabling new threat actors to enter the fray.
Simply blocking attacks will no longer be a sufficient form of defence because GenAI will quickly regroup or pivot the attack automatically without the need to employ additional resource. If we look at how APIs, which are intrinsic to customer services and open banking for instance, are currently protected, the emphasis has been on detection and blocking but going forward we can expect deceptive response to play a far greater role. This frustrates and exhausts the resources of the attacker, making the attacks cost-prohibitive to sustain.
So how should the sector look to embrace AI given the current state of regulatory flux? As with any digital transformation project, there needs to be oversight of how AI will be used within the business, with a working group tasked to develop an AI framework. In addition to NIST, there are a number of security standards that can help here such as ISO 22989, ISO 23053, ISO 23984 and ISO 42001 and the oversight framework set out in DORA (Digital Operational Resilience Act) for third party providers. The framework should encompass the tools the firm has with AI functionality, their possible application in terms of use cases, and the risks associated with these, as well as how it will mitigate any areas of high risk.
Taking a proactive approach makes far more sense than suspending the use of AI which effectively places firms at the mercy of adversaries who will be quick to take advantage of the technology. These are tumultuous times and we can certainly expect AI to rewrite the rulebook when it comes to attack and defence. But firms must get to grips with how they can integrate the technology rather than electing to switch it off and continue as usual.
You may like
Business
Technology’s Role in Transforming Insurance: From AI to Cyber Risk
Source: Finance Derivative
Authored by Samiul Chowdhury, Principal Actuarial Consultant, RNA Analytics
The insurance industry is undergoing a significant transformation, driven by rapid advancements in technology. From property and casualty to life insurance, the role of digital solutions has never been more important. Today, it’s almost impossible to imagine a successful, compliant insurance business without technology at its core.
But how exactly is technology reshaping the insurance landscape? And what does it mean for the future of actuarial work, AI, and cyber risk? Let’s explore.
The Essential Role of Technology in Modern Insurance
Technology is the cornerstone of the successful modern insurance business – whether property, casualty or life. It’s no longer optional—it’s essential! Operating a successful and compliant insurance company today without the help of software solutions would be a real challenge. Whether it’s managing customer data, meeting regulatory demands, or assessing risk, technology is at the heart of everything modern insurers do.
In recent years, regulatory compliance has been a top priority for (re)insurers across the globe, with IFRS 17 probably the number one focus. The new accounting standards are highly complex, and their implementation has forced many insurers to rethink and redesign their entire approach to financial reporting and infrastructure. However, this challenge has also been a catalyst for technological innovation.
One of the most significant changes brought about by IFRS 17 is the integration of traditionally siloed such as functions such as actuarial, finance and accounting functions. This alignment gives insurers unprecedented insight into opportunities and risks, enabling them to make more informed decisions. Beyond compliance, accuracy and extensive flexibility, this integration offers insurers a chance to enhance accuracy, achieve greater flexibility, and gain a deeper understanding of their financial landscape.
How AI is Changing the Actuarial World
Much has been said aboutArtificial Intelligence (AI) and its potential to disrupt industries. In insurance, AI is already proving to be a game-changer, especially in actuarial work. With the right approach, AI holds great promise of making processes smoother and bringing faster, more accurate decision-making into play.
However, AI is not here to replace actuaries. Instead, it enhances actuaries’ roles by automating their routine tasks such as data pre-processing, model fitting, and report generation. This automation allows actuaries to focus on more strategic tasks, giving them a more central role within the organizations.
Meanwhile, AI modelling introduces new sources of uncertainty. Actuaries must understand the limitations and assumptions behind the AI models they are using. It’s important to ensure that these are fair, unbiased, and ethical —particularly when it comes to pricing and underwriting. This means actuaries will need to pick up new skills, especially in data science and programming languages like Python and R.
In other words, AI offers actuaries the chance to work more efficiently and strategically, but only if they are prepared to navigate the complexities it brings.
The Growing Challenge of Cyber Risk. How Do Insurers Keep Up?
Cyber risk has emerged as one of the most significant threats insurers face today. Cyber insurance is not the same as it was twenty years ago. The policies were relatively simpler, and insurers didn’t have as much data or experience to rely on. Today, they are more complex, reflecting the increased scale and sophistication of cyber threats.
As cyberattacks have increased, so has our ability to model and understand them. Insurers have gained more data over time, which has allowed them to get a better grip on the risks involved. However, here is the thing: technology evolves, and so do the threats. Whether it’s a data breach, ransomware attack, or even non-malicious technical failures like the recent CrowdStrike outage, the risks are more systemic and far-reaching than ever.
Looking ahead, as we enter the Web3 era where information becomes ever more interconnected and managed by semantic metadata, we’ll have a complete set of new vulnerabilities. Business models will shift, and with that, the risks insurers will need to cover. By 2044, cyber insurance policies will probably look quite different from what we see today.
Conclusion
The insurance industry is at a turning point, driven by the rapid adoption of technology and the increasing complexity of risks like cyber threats. To stay ahead of the curve, insurers need to embrace AI, data-driven decision-making processes, and advanced risk models.
Business
The EPC’s Verification of Payee rulebook: Five things banks need to consider
Source: Finance Derivative
Pratiksha Pathak, Head of Payments Services at RedCompass Labs, shares her insights on the Verification of Payee’s (VoP) impact and what it means for European payment service provers (PSPs).
Fraud is an ever-present threat in the payments landscape, and with the rise of instant payments, the risk has never been greater. While these rapid transactions offer unmatched convenience, they also pave the way for instant fraud, leaving financial institutions with minimal time to intercept suspicious activity.
In October, the European Payments Council (EPC) published the long-awaited Verification of Payee rulebook, which marked a major milestone in the SEPA Instant Payment Regulations (IPR) and a key effort to combat payments fraud.
In 2022 alone, fraudulent credit transfers, direct debits, card payments, cash withdrawals, and e-money transactions across the EEA reached a staggering €4.3 billion, with an additional €2.0 billion lost in just the first half of 2023.
The VoP rulebook aims to standardise how banks confirm payee account details, protecting consumers from fraudulent transactions. However, while the intentions are solid, the new regulations present several challenges that banks must address swiftly and efficiently.
- Tight deadlines leave no room for error
The deadlines are tight. Banks must have a VoP solution in place across all payment channels by 5th October 2025, which is just four days before the IPR comes into effect. Unfortunately, it doesn’t matter if a bank uses an existing domestic verification service since the rulebook standardises how account information is verified in payments across Europe.
This means that every bank will need to adapt or overhaul its systems to meet pan-European standards. Given the verification process will apply to both SEPA and SEPA Instant payments across all payment channels, it will be a big lift for banks.
The challenges are compounded by the rollout of the EPC Directory Service (EDS), which is the centralised database that underpins the scheme. The EDS won’t be ready for testing until late June 2025. This leaves only three months for banks to complete end-to-end testing and fully deploy their solutions.
Some aspects of VoP, such as APIs and channel infrastructure, can be built in advance, but banks won’t be able to conduct end-to-end testing until after the EDS is ready. For institutions grappling with legacy systems or more complex architectures, the timeline is daunting and leaves little to no room for error.
- The 5-second rule is a small change with a big impact
Another key change is the extended verification window. Banks now have five seconds, rather than three, to confirm payee account details across all channels.
Whilst this may seem generous, it is still a tight squeeze given the intricacies involved. This means that both the payment engine and all customer-facing channels—whether online, mobile, phone, or paper-based—must be highly available, fast, and scalable.
Ensuring a smooth customer experience, especially for non-digital transactions, will test banks’ technological limits. While mobile and online platforms might be better equipped, accommodating phone and bulk transactions introduces layers of complexity.
It may be more time than before, but the five-second verification window leaves little margin for error – never mind the one-second timeframe the EPC would prefer.
- Bulk payments are a logistical headache
One of the most complex aspects is VoP’s application to bulk-payment files, such as salary payouts. The rulebook demands that each individual payment in a file undergo verification, potentially creating a logistical nightmare.
Imagine a scenario where thousands of payments trigger a mix of ‘match’, ‘close match’, and ‘no match’ results. As a bank, how do you relay this information to your client within 5 seconds? Do you provide the notifications in a file? Through an app? A checklist?
Handling a flood of verification requests within seconds requires not only a robust infrastructure but also meticulous planning. Banks must devise sophisticated mechanisms to process and deliver results without disrupting the broader payment workflow to prevent operational chaos.
- Legacy systems will feel the pain
For many banks, the biggest challenge lies in integrating VoP into long-established SEPA payment systems because it requires modifications to processes that are already running smoothly.
Banks need to ensure that all their payment channels can incorporate VoP functionality without disrupting the current flow. Banks may need to upgrade or completely rework several parts, making the process complicated and costly.
Verifying payees at the beginning of a transaction requires changes to how these systems interact and handle data. Banks will also need to ensure that existing transactions continue without delays and errors, which will prove to be a big challenge for those with multiple existing payment channels.
- Navigating routing and verification is complex
The new EPC/European Directory Service (EDS) may bring operational challenges. Whilst the EDS serves as a directory, it doesn’t handle the actual routing or verification of VoP requests and responses. Most banks now need to develop their own routing and verification mechanisms (RVMs).
These RVMs will act as connection points for participants and banks must either integrate directly with the EDS or use an RVM to route VoP requests. However, using an RVM doesn’t absolve the responding PSP of its responsibilities under the scheme’s rules.
Banks face a significant challenge in setting up or partnering with an RVM to manage this new process, but finding an RVM supplier will be a good place to start.
The bottom line
The EPC’s VoP rulebook is a decisive step forward in improving payment security across Europe, but it also introduces significant challenges for banks.
As banks start to prepare for this overhaul, balancing compliance with operational efficiency will be key to protecting customers whilst maintaining a seamless payment experience.
European banks have their work cut out for them. The demands of implementing VoP are high, and the timeline is short. But with the right expertise and strategic planning, it can be done.
Business
How eCash and digital wallets will diversify the payments landscape in 2025
Source: Finance Derivative
Written by Fernando Costa-Cabral, SVP Branded Payments, and Ishan Vaid, VP Core Features, at Paysafe.
Throughout 2025, we’ll see two seemingly opposing payment methods – eCash and digital wallets – further reshaping how consumers manage their money. While cash – and future access to it – is still critically important for consumers, digital payments are undergoing a huge transformation.
eCash will continue to bridge the digital divide by ensuring consumers can use physical currency to buy goods and services online. As a result, businesses will leverage it as a democratizing force to promote financial inclusion and serve diverse consumer segments.
Digital wallets also have a major role to play in the evolving payments landscape, with 32% of consumers reporting to have increased their use of wallets in 2024. A notable development is the rise of brand-owned wallets, as businesses outside the financial services sector seek to establish closed-loop ecosystems to control and enhance the customer experience.
With a view to the year ahead, here is how eCash and digital wallets will evolve throughout 2025.
Bridging the digital divide with eCash
Even in today’s digital world, cash plays a vital role in consumer finances. Recent research from Paysafe has revealed that 63% of consumers harbor concerns about losing access to cash, while 44% want the option to buy items online and pay in cash at a brick-and-mortar store.
This preference stems from the unique advantages of cash: it provides tangible financial security, enables precise spending control, and helps users avoid the often-hidden costs commonly associated with credit-based payments. Across geographies, cash remains essential for reducing financial anxiety and ensuring reliable transactions.
Despite its enduring importance, cash has largely remained on the sidelines of the recent payment revolution. Traditional cash-based operations continue to be cumbersome and time-consuming – whether it’s depositing physical money into a bank account, coordinating international cash transfers, or attempting to set up installment payments. Furthermore, the retail sector has generally overlooked cash users when developing modern consumer incentives such as cashback programs, buy-now-pay-later (BNPL) schemes, or subscription-based services, creating a noticeable gap in the market.
That is all now changing. This year, eCash will solidify its position as the right solution to bridge this divide between physical currency and our increasingly digital economy – making cash more relevant and accessible in the modern world. In the year ahead, eCash’s progression will materialize through three main developments: enhanced security measures, value-added features, and a significantly improved user experience. With these improvements, eCash can transform traditional cash into a simple and secure payment method with the same core benefits that make cash valuable to many people.
Digital wallets will diversify the payments landscape
In a similar vein to eCash, digital wallets are diversifying the payments landscape, with non-financial brands increasingly venturing into the territory once dominated by incumbent financial service providers. By acquiring their own digital wallet solutions, these brands are reducing their dependence on external financial institutions and enhancing the payment experience.
The trend toward brand-owned wallets has already gained traction in Asian markets, with e-wallets now being offered by ride-hailing apps and e-commerce platforms – and we anticipate a significant uptake in markets like the UK over the coming year. Specifically, retail chains, gaming platforms, and logistics companies are all exploring how digital wallets can streamline their payment processes, strengthen customer loyalty, and deliver greater control over the user experience.
There’s particularly strong momentum building around white-label wallet solutions, which provide businesses with a sophisticated approach to payment integration. These solutions enable brands to incorporate advanced wallet functionalities directly into their existing platforms while maintaining complete control over their user interface and experience. This development aligns with a broader strategic shift we’ve observed across various sectors – from gaming and retail to mobility services – where brands increasingly want a closed-loop ecosystem that they manage.
In 2025, we can anticipate four key evolutionary trends in the digital wallet space. First, we will see even more seamless integration of wallet functionality into non-financial platforms, allowing users to complete transactions without leaving their preferred brand’s ecosystem. Second, there will be significant advances in real-time currency conversion capabilities and multi-currency wallet features, catering to the growing demands of global commerce and international travel. Third, we can expect enhanced instant settlement capabilities, supported by faster payment rails that align with contemporary consumer expectations for immediate transaction processing and gratification. Finally, there will be an increased emphasis on sustainability, with digital wallets incorporating eco-friendly features such as carbon footprint tracking to meet the growing consumer demand for environmentally responsible financial services.
While these two technologies and their respective journeys aren’t necessarily joined at the hip, as 2025 unfolds both eCash and digital wallets will help to create a more accessible and customer-centric financial system. This evolution isn’t about choosing between cash and digital – it’s about seamlessly bridging both worlds, giving consumers and brands greater control over how they pay and get paid.